Friday, January 23, 2026

[389-users] howto retrieve backend cache statistics with mdb on 389ds 2.5.x ?

It seems if one configures 389ds 2.x instance with mdb backend, one
loses the ability to run "dsconf <instance> monitor dbmon", with
"Error: list index out of range". This is a known issue:
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/6614 .

"dsconf <instance> monitor ldbm" appears to provide some of the same
information, in particular with normalizeddncachehitratio, but not
necessarily for the backend entry cache information, or am I mistaken?

Outside of upgrading to the latest version, is there an alternative
means of retrieving the same information that "monitor dbmon"
provides? Or, should I stick to bdb until I get around to upgrading
to 389ds 3.x?

This issue observed with:
% rpm -qi 389-ds|head -n3
Name : 389-ds
Version : 2.5.3~git144.95b15d57c
Release : 150700.3.6.1

on SLES15_sp7

% dsconf dev backend config get |grep nsslapd-backend-implement
nsslapd-backend-implement: mdb
% dsconf dev monitor dbmon
Error: list index out of range

Thanks,
Bob
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Posted by at No comments:

[389-users] Re: version upgrade advice

Hi, 

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 6:26 PM Neel Karandikar via 389-users <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I am looking for some advice regarding upgrading our deployment.
I am currently on v2.0.15 running on four AlmaLinux release 8.10
Running cockpit-389-ds as well

Based on this page
Thanks for the report, I will update the page to mention other versioned repos. 
The copr repo
is at 2.2.9-2

Available Packages
Name         : 389-ds-base
Version      : 2.2.9
Release      : 2.el8
Architecture : src
Size         : 22 M
Source       : None
Repository   : copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_389ds:389-directory-server
Summary      : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL          : https://www.port389.org
License      : GPLv3+ and (ASL 2.0 or MIT) and MIT and (0BSD or MIT or ASL 2.0) and (Unlicense or MIT) and MPLv2.0 and BSD and (ASL 2.0 with exceptions or ASL 2.0 or MIT) and (MIT or
             : zlib or ASL 2.0) and ASL 2.0 and (ASL 2.0 or Boost) and ((MIT or ASL 2.0) and Unicode-DFS-2016)
Description  : 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server.  The base package includes
             : the LDAP server and command line utilities for server administration.

I see that there are other repos representing multiple versions that I could move to from here depending on what copr repo I point at
I am unsure if i should switch my repo and what is the easiest upgrade as well 🙂
migrating to Alma 9 is probably in the cards later this year as well so that might be a factor in picking a version ...

Unless you require WebUI, I recommend a version that ships with the distro itself. 
These upstream repos are maintained on the best-effort basis, and I will be working on bringing them up to date.

thx!
NeeL
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Viktor
Posted by at No comments:

Thursday, January 22, 2026

[389-users] version upgrade advice

I am looking for some advice regarding upgrading our deployment.
I am currently on v2.0.15 running on four AlmaLinux release 8.10
Running cockpit-389-ds as well

Based on this page
389 Directory Server - Download
The copr repo
Builds for @389ds/389-directory-server
is at 2.2.9-2

Available Packages
Name         : 389-ds-base
Version      : 2.2.9
Release      : 2.el8
Architecture : src
Size         : 22 M
Source       : None
Repository   : copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_389ds:389-directory-server
Summary      : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL          : https://www.port389.org
License      : GPLv3+ and (ASL 2.0 or MIT) and MIT and (0BSD or MIT or ASL 2.0) and (Unlicense or MIT) and MPLv2.0 and BSD and (ASL 2.0 with exceptions or ASL 2.0 or MIT) and (MIT or
             : zlib or ASL 2.0) and ASL 2.0 and (ASL 2.0 or Boost) and ((MIT or ASL 2.0) and Unicode-DFS-2016)
Description  : 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server.  The base package includes
             : the LDAP server and command line utilities for server administration.

I see that there are other repos representing multiple versions that I could move to from here depending on what copr repo I point at
Project List
I am unsure if i should switch my repo and what is the easiest upgrade as well 🙂
migrating to Alma 9 is probably in the cards later this year as well so that might be a factor in picking a version ...

thx!
NeeL
Posted by at No comments:

[Test-Announce]Most Quality repos have been migrated to Forge

Hey folks,
we've almost [1] finished our migration, and you can find most of our repositories now at Fedora Forge.

Our main ticketing repo is now here:

All the rest of our repos can be found in under the Quality organization:

Please update your bookmarks. The previous repos on Pagure have been switched to read-only.

After you log in to Fedora Forge for the first time (using your Fedora account), don't forget to enable email notifications, so that you can receive updates for your requests:

Cheers,
Kamil


Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

[Test-Announce]Fedora 44 Rawhide 20260121.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 44 Rawhide 20260121.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/44

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20260121.n.1_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
--
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
--
_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

[fedora-arm] Re: CPU temperature

Hi David,

> Is there a way of monitoring CPU temperature for Fedora aarch64 RPI 5
> yet, please?

tmon in the kernel-tools package is a tool to do that, I don't believe
patches have been posted yet to do thermal management which is I think
what you're actually asking about.

Peter

I have been away, I have you other email on my list to reply to but
haven't got to it in my backlog yet.
--
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Posted by at No comments:

[fedora-arm] CPU temperature

Is there a way of monitoring CPU temperature for Fedora aarch64 RPI 5
yet, please?

--
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)