Re: Creating a "Fedora Incubator" brand

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXIlQ6AAoJEKbW5zOgIHzUnFgIAM2cWfQPU94i34gLtZsyKeQs
Ihn//sUmDuEEYEvJgqPZEBKptgTAyxTC+lDjoL177sbVTgcXmxEIaPLWizKWmudR
cQqqJOjNdKWIVlD97VzgBH7X67qfbqH6s7BhvI+lGeQafbSZJbEbJz2FO8sTJNiy
gZg2M6PlUArIWhKeS5XYR9UzYCrlwRuxlK21weLOKqkRXSOTo9+hNoD91CPlsGb1
bJe//m1IRo3RyaI3lhwgTbZu4zvvSw9Lz9uEm3CW3m7ZID4UZDd55iGYoWzByzg0
zkVyd2vm5Gzvdv13codTGYWyNMm48flng/ripJLqOxDxsUeJwfLJoyh13umUWYw=
=vrUP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 04/28/2016 11:02 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I think we might benefit from having an official branding for
> initiatives somewhere in between — work done *in* the project, but not
> necessarily yet accepted into our "mainline". This would encourage
> innovation _within_ Fedora without causing confusion over whether
> something is "official".

1) would this create confusion with something like the Apache Incubator,
which is well-defined but not well-understood outside Apache circles?

2) I like the idea, but an example project might help illustrate here.

3) What are the criteria for "graduating"? Who are the mentors in this
example? (Mentors are a key part of the incubator for Apache.)

Best,

jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/