Friday, April 22, 2016

Re: Proposed Adjusted Budget Scenarios for FY17

===============================================================================
Budget
===============================================================================

Scenario 1: Full FADs, Full Outreachy
Scenario 2: Full FADs, Zero Outreachy
Scenario 3: Half FADs, Full Outreachy
Scenario 4: Half FADs, Half Outreachy
Scenario 5: Half FADs, Zero Outreachy

R/4: Regional budget, divided Evenly
R*HS: Historial Split (.16, .26, .16, .42)

Legend:
-------
fF/FDI Full FADS, Full D&I
fF/-DI Full FADS, zero D&I
hF/DI half FADS, Full D&I
hF/hDI half FADS, Half D&I
hF/-DI half FADS, zero D&I
R/4 Regional budget, divided Evenly
R*HS Historical Split (.125, .27, .165, .438)


fF/fDI fF/-DI fF/hDI hF/DI hF/hDI hF/-DI
Events
------
FUDCon LATAM 15000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000
FUDCon APAC 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000
Flock 75000 75000 75000 75000 75000 75000
FADs 30000 30000 30000 15000 15000 15000
D&I 11000 0 5500 11000 5500 0
----------------------------------------------------------------
Big Number 195000 195000 195000 195000 195000 195000
subtotal 156000 145000 135500 126000 120500 115000
Regional 39000 50000 59500 69000 74500 80000
FADS Breakdown

--------------
Docs2016 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
Design2016 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
Cloud2016 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
FAD #1 5000 0 5000 0 0 0
FAD #2 5000 0 5000 0 0 0
FAD #3 5000 0 5000 0 0 0

D&I Breakdown
-------------
Outreachy Winter 5500 0 2250 5500 2250 0
Outreachy Spring 5500 0 2250 5500 2250 0


Regions: R/4
------------
APAC 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
EMEA 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
LATAM 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000

Regions: R*HS
-------------
APAC (.16) 6240 8000 9520 11040 11920 12800
EMEA (.26) 10140 13000 15470 17940 19370 20800
LATAM (.16) 6240 8000 9520 11040 11920 12800
NA (.42) 16380 21000 24990 28980 31290 33600

Historical Diff: R/4
--------------------
APAC (12650) 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
-2900 -150 +2225 +4600 +5975 +7350
-23% +18% +58%

EMEA (27000) 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
-17250 -14500 -12125 -9750 -8375 -7000
-64% -45% -26%

LATAM (16500) 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
-6750 -4000 -1625 +750 +2125 +3500
-41% -10% +21%

NA (43850) 9750 12500 14875 17250 18625 20000
-34100 -31350 -28975 -26600 -25225 -23850
-78% -66% -54%

Historical Diff: R*HS
---------------------
APAC (.127) 6240 8000 9520 11040 11920 12800
(12650) -6410 -4650 -3130 -1610 -730 +150
-51% -25% +1%

EMEA (.27) 10140 13000 15470 17940 19370 20800
(27000) -16860 -14000 -11530 -9060 -7630 -6200
-62% -43% -23%

LATAM (.165) 6240 8000 9520 11040 11920 12800
(16500) -10260 -8500 -6980 -5460 -4580 -3700
-62% -42% -22%

NA (.438) 16380 21000 24990 28980 31290 33600
(43850) -27470 -22850 -18860 -14870 -12560 -10250
-63% -43% -23%

===============================================================================
Notes
===============================================================================

19:33:36 <mattdm> #info Allocation of regional portion of budget over last
three years roughly APAC 16%, EMEA 26%, LATAM 16%, NA 42%. This is nominal,
not money actually spent. FY17 and future budgets not necessarily based on
this number.


Big Number
----------
FY14 TOTAL 195,000
FY15 TOTAL 195,000
FY16 TOTAL 195,000
FY17 TOTAL 195,000

Historical Percentages
----------------------
APAC 16%
EMEA 26%
LATAM 16%
NA 42%

Historical Allocated Numbers (FY15 + FY16)
------------------------------------------
Region w/FE
APAC 12650 (222650)
Q1: 2900
Q2: 10750
Q3: 3000
Q4: 6000
FE: 10000

EMEA 27000 (102000)
Q1: 12000
Q2: 80000
Q3: 5000
Q4: 5000
FE: 75000

LATAM 16500 (26500)
Q1: 6000
Q2: 3000
Q3: 3750
Q4: 3750
FE: 10000

NA 43850 (43850)
Q1: 7850
Q2: 15000
Q3: 7000
Q4: 14000

Final Reported FY16
-------------------
Planned Adjusted Actual
APAC ??? ??? ???
EMEA 35,670 31,746 29,014
LATAM ??? ??? ???
NA ??? ??? ???
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, María Leandro <tatica@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello from Fedora Diversity and stuff side of the wheel.
>
> My country has been experiencing some randomly 2h power outages, that's why
> I've been in/out most of the meetings. Sorry about that.
>
> Now that apologies have been made and after reading most of the logs related
> to budget, this year I think that Diversity shouldn't require much since our
> first efforts are to identify our minorities, and get a bigger perspective.
> Beyond people attending to different events to talk about the Diversity team
> (which will come inside each event budget) don't think we would need much.
>
> There is a special gathering that we will held this year, the Fedora Women
> Day, which is intended to join all Fedorian's Females into a huge
> online/presencial event to share knowledge and experiences. Since we have
> females all around the world, I don't think that an in-place event could
> gather so many females as an online could do, however, if some small budget
> could be allocated to move locally people or just send a thank you box, that
> would be it.
>
> The FWD is not held because we care more about females than other
> minorities, is just because was the first idea that came up and so we
> pushed, as we are doing the same with the survey, articles and statements
> that are already out there. Our goal is to make awareness events every year
> with each minority (and probably some day a larger one with everyone) to
> show our diversity with pride and make a comfortable space at Fedora where
> everyone can feel at home.
>
> All of this is new just as the position is, so there was no way to put a
> request before on the budget planning.
>
> 2016-04-15 14:46 GMT-04:30 Ruth Suehle <rsuehle@redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> The "same-as" numbers were already in our stars for this year, because we
>> are actually seeing the results of the "same-as" process that we've always
>> had. The new process officially started Q1FY17. If we wanted to make the
>> case for growth in this cycle, that is something that needed to happen by
>> the end of Q3FY16.
>>
>>
>> For clarity, while this year's budget numbers are not yet officially
>> official (despite it being six weeks into the fiscal year, and those of you
>> who have been around a long time know this is normal), this year's budget
>> process did start somewhat earlier. The requests from Red Hat departments
>> were due in October of last year. Please do not shoot the messenger over how
>> odd this timeline is. But that's what it is. So if you want a bigger budget
>> in FY18, you've got between now and October--that's now roughly five
>> months--to show major change. And FWIW, it is also not only Fedora that has
>> seen less budget than it would like this year. It is a lean year all around.
>>
>> Ruth
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> council-discuss mailing list
>> council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
>> open source software and content as a collaborative community.
>
>
>
>
> --
> tatica
> Maria Gracia Leandro
> http://www.tatica.org
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica
> LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56


Councils,

I have pushed the requested scenario (fF/hDI -- full-FAD, Half
Outreachy) to the scenarios.txt file in the repo, and attached it here
for your reference.

If you have any other questions, just drop me a line :)

Looking Forward
--RemyD.


--
Remy DeCausemaker
Fedora Community Lead & Council
<decause@redhat.com>
https://whatcanidoforfedora.org

No comments:

Post a Comment