[389-users] Re: ldapsearch performance problem

Hi Davind,

thanks for answer


Am 15.06.2018 um 22:15 schrieb David Boreham:
>
>
> On 6/15/2018 2:04 PM, Jan Kowalsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> What I can see are a log of unindexec component queries, most of them
>> like:
>>
>> [15/Jun/2018:21:51:14 +0200] conn=462 op=31251 SRCH
>> base="ou=Domains,dc=example,dc=org" scope=2
>> filter="(&(objectClass=domainrelatedobject)(associatedDomain=example.net))"
>>
>> attrs="associatedDomain inetDomainBaseDN"
>> [15/Jun/2018:21:51:14 +0200] conn=462 op=31251 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>> nentries=1 etime=0 notes=U
>>
>>
> The "etime=0" implies that this is not the operation you are looking for.

The maximum I ever had was etime=4

[15/Jun/2018:20:22:43 +0200] conn=95644 op=17 SRCH
base="dc=example,dc=de" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=inetorgperson)(mail=test@example.n
et))" attrs="entryuuid nsUniqueId objectguid guid ipauniqueid
distinguishedName uid samaccountname memberOf dknOwncloudQuota mail
mail jpegPhoto thu
mbnailphoto"
[15/Jun/2018:20:22:47 +0200] conn=95644 op=17 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=0 etime=4

And they result from nexcloud query with a lot of base dns configured...

> Looking back at your original question, I am wondering : when you say
> that some searches are very slow do you mean "searches with certain
> properties in terms of filter and so on" or do you mean " for the exact
> same kind of search, submitted over and over, some responses are very
> slow but most are very fast"?

The latter. The same queries are sometimes fast and hang some times.

Regards
Jan
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XWOMCG5MHBMBXF4XTVAQL6LDBYVL3HAM/