[389-users] Re: Expected Write/Read Behavior in a Supplier/Consumer scenario...

On 7/2/2018 2:54 PM, Artur Lojewski wrote:
> Question: If I issue a delete operation to a read-only replica, and the delete request ist properly resend to the actual supplier, can I expect (?) that an immediate read to the consumer does not find the deleted object?
Note : you wrote "ist" above. I'm assuming this should be "is" (not
"isn't")
No. Nothing will have changed in the consumer's database (hence :
read-only).
> Or do I have to wait until the supplier initiated replication (immediate) has taken place?
Yes.
>
> The current behavior his that I still can read back the "deleted" object from the read-only replica until the replication is over. Is that correct behavior?
Yes.
> Or can I 'tweak' things that even on a read-only replica a deleted object is immediately not available, even before replication starts.
>
No.

The servers implement "async" or "eventually consistent" replication.
Clients have to deal with stale reads.


_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GY4FQ3R6G4UOJ4INRWNEW3IYIMFKBOMR/