[389-devel] Re: Porting Perl scripts

On 6/24/19 11:46 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:

Hi team,  I am working on porting our admin Perl scripts to Python CLI.  Please, check the list and share your opinion:    - cl-dump.pl - dumps and decodes changelog. Is it used often (if at all)?  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#cl_dump.pl_Dump_and_decode_changelog

This is used often actually, and is a good debugging tool.   I think it just creates a task, so it should be ported to CLI (added to replication CLI sub commands)

    - logconv.pl - parse and analise the access logs. Pretty big one, is it priority? How much people use it?    issue is created - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50283  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#logconv_pl

Does not need to be ported as its a standalone tool

    - migrate.pl - which migration scenarios do we plan to support?    Do we depricate old ones? Do we need the script?  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#migrate-ds.pl

This script is obsolete IMHO

    - ns_accountstatus.pl, ns_inactivate.pl, ns_activate.pl - the issue is    discussed here - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50206    I think we should extend status at least. Also, William put there some    of his thoughts. What do you think, guys? Will we refactor    (kinda depricate) some "account lock" as William proposing?  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#ldif2db.pl_Import-ns_accountstatus.pl_Establish_account_status

I will update the ticket, but we need the same functionality of the ns_* tools, especially the new status work that went into ns_accountstatus.pl - that all came from customer escalations so we must not lose that functionality.

    - syntax-validate.pl - it probably will go to 'healthcheck' tool    issue is created - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50173  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#syntax-validate.pl

Yes

    - repl_monitor.pl - should we make it a part of 'healthcheck' too?  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#repl_monitor.pl_Monitor_replication_status

Yes

    Thanks,  Simon  

_______________________________________________  389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org  To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org  Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines  List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org