On 05/04/2020 14:21, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:44, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:
>> Instead of thanking me, Hartman immediately made a series of
>> personal attacks to undermine that work.
>
> In all honesty, I don't think many people are reading your emails now.
Please be careful not to try and speak for everybody else. I understand
some people are sick of dirty politics: I'm one of them.
Personally, I receive emails and other reminders about the hostilities
almost every day, it has only intensified since Hartman's most recent
attacks. Most of them are supportive of my work yet I would very much
like to find a solution to end all that. Matt's recent email didn't
appear to acknowledge that overall situation but maybe he doesn't fully
understand it from the perspective of a volunteer.
> Perhaps you could try doing something awesome in Fedora rather than
> sending endless emails about personal attacks you believe you suffered
> working on Debian.
I recently asked[1] for help testing the latest RTC solutions. Please
feel free to test and reply there. These are the things I usually
promote through my blogs too. Among other things, when we release
reSIProcate 1.12.0 this month I would like to publish a blog thanking
all the contributors.
Regards,
Daniel
1.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T7J52CF4OEDFSXQEK26P7MAVNU74CBKT/
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
No comments:
Post a Comment