[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 33 ARM and BTRFS

I have looked through the source of the arm-image-installer and now
understand exactly what it is doing and yes I see how it really is not
suited to setting the FS, the image determines that.


BTRFS versions of the minimal images would be nice but I guess not
essential as I have managed until now without BTRFS on my ARM devices.


If doing BTRFS images for none-desktop images, then minimal is probably
enough as one can build up whatever they want from that.


Regards


Michael Whapples

On 14/11/2020 21:44, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM Michael Whapples
> <contact@ashotinthedark.online> wrote:
>> Neal and Matthew thanks for clarifying that. Yes the various
>> announcements do say desktop editions, the significance of that must
>> have just passed me by.
>>
>>
>> would be nice if the ARM image installer would allow selecting the FS
>> when writing the image. Not sure how much work that would be to support.
>>
> Unfortunately, that would be very hard. If it was desired, *maybe* we
> could produce alternate Btrfs-based versions for the non-desktop
> variants...
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org