On 8/11/21 9:23 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:
11.11.2020 22:03, Mark Reynolds пишет:On 11/3/20 8:50 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:03.11.2020 15:58, Mark Reynolds пишет:On 11/3/20 4:41 AM, Stanislav Levin wrote:Hello. Currently, I package 1.4.1 branch as the former-stable for ALTLinux. But it is not updated since July, too stable? 1.4.x branches in upstream: upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.1This is no longer being maintainedupstream/389-ds-base-1.4.2This branch is about to stop being maintainedupstream/389-ds-base-1.4.3This would be the "most" stable branch at this time.upstream/389-ds-base-1.4.4 upstream/master1.4.4 and master (2.0.0) are not "stable" and include more cutting edge changes and features. HTH, MarkIt would be much appreciated such future changes will be announced at time. I think the other distro-packagers need this information too.We follow the Fedora release schedule: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases?rd=Releases/ So... F34(rawhide) --> 389-ds-base-2.0.0 F33 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.4 F32 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.3 F31 --> 389-ds-base-1.4.2 Now F31 is probably going to be EOLed sooner than later, so we will stop maintaining 1.4.2 at that time. I will add something to the landing page of our wiki about this topic.Hi! Any news on this? Could you please point me to which branch is current stable or LTS?
389-ds-base-1.4.3 and 1.4.4 are the most stable, 389-ds-base-2.0 and master branch are still under heavy development.
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
-- Directory Server Development Team