Wednesday, April 13, 2022

[389-users] Re: Meta directory plugin in 389ds?

> On 13 Apr 2022, at 20:31, Alex <al-389users@none.at> wrote:
>
> Hi William.
>
> Thank you for your Answer.
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:38:54 +0000
> William Brown <william.brown@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Apr 2022, at 04:41, Alex <al-389users@none.at> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear List-Members.
>>>
>>> Please can you help me to find the right plugin, if there is any, in 386ds
>>> which can be used similar to the slapd-meta and slapo-rwm?
>>>
>>> https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=slapd-meta&sektion=5&manpath=OpenLDAP+2.6-Release&format=html
>>> https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=slapo-rwm&sektion=5&apropos=0&manpath=OpenLDAP+2.6-Release
>>
>> We don't have anything like slapd-meta, but we do have cos which could
>> suffice for rwm. Have a look at:
>>
>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11
>
> With "cos" you mean "Class of Service" right,
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#Class_of_Service_Plug_in
>
> and the corresponding howto.
> https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-classofservice.html
>
> Btw. the link on the howto should point to this page, IMHO.
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/html-single/administration_guide/index#Advanced_Entry_Management-Assigning_Class_of_Service
>
>
>>> What I try to achieve is to create a meta directory in front on MS Active
>>> Directory for different AD Groups and propagate this group via 386ds.
>>
>> You could use ad-sync to consume data into 389-ds, and then cos to template
>> out extra groups and data on-top?
>
> Well I don't want to store any data on DS I just want to use it as poxy and
> cache in front of AD.
>

Can't do that sorry. Beside all the security and access control risks, we don't have a way to "proxy" this. You have to be able to sync that data so we can do the transforms.

>> I think a more detailed worked example could help us to know if the advice we
>> are giving is correct :)
>
> I'm in the concept phase an try to find the right product for the customer
> which want to use a SSO solution.
> keycloak is one of the options and therefor I just wanted to know if the 389ds
> could be used somehow as proxy and mapping thing in front of keycloak.
>
> As far as I understood the architecture of 389ds it looks to me that this
> feature isn't there, right?

I dont think these layers do what you want?

What do you mean by SSO here? What protocols do you need to support?

I think you'd have:

Oauth2 -> Keycloak -> 389ds -> AD

OR

Oauth2 -> Keycloak -> AD




>
>>> I have seen this plugins but I don't know the wording in 386ds therefore I
>>> hope anybody can help me to find the right wording and plugins in 386ds if
>>> this is possible.
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference
>>>
>>> Thank you for any help.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Alex
>>> _______________________________________________
>
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> William Brown
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Identity and Access Management
>> SUSE Labs, Australia
>> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

--
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer,
Identity and Access Management
SUSE Labs, Australia
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

No comments:

Post a Comment