[389-users] Re: A more profound replication monitoring of 389-ds instance

On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 05:50 +0000, dweller dweller wrote:
> Oops, I ment to post this diagram
> https://pastebin.com/HZZjCtFJ
>
> The vision was, I guess, for each common-replica to have a connection with its
> own downstream client's replica, in order to not exceed 4 replication
> agreements per replica.

You might consider a replication hub and spoke model. Where all replication
agreements point to the replication hub nodes.

perhaps something like this would improve replication performance?

+--+ +--+ +--+ +--+
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
+--+ +--+ +--+ +--+
| +---+ +---+ |
| | | | | |
+--->| | | |<---+
replication hub
+-------->| | | | <------+
| +---+ +---+ |
| |
+--++ +--+ +--+++--+
| | | | | || |
| | | | | || |
+---+ +--+ +--++---+


_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue