[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:51 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 22:02 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW: anyone at
> > > > all to come up with a genius fix, otherwise we'll likely have to
> > > > document this
> > >
> > > Happy to oblige ;--]
> >
> > Genius located! Thanks, Zbigniew :)
>
> Be careful of this solution. Time functions were formerly returning an
> error until the RTC was set to an accurate time. The new behavior is
> to return a fake/incorrect time without an error. I don't think it's a
> good idea to misreport something time system wide without error.
>
> You might want to consider other ways to get beyond signature checks
> that are less intrusive, and not system wide.

There isn't any new behaviour. We're just doing a new systemd build for
F38 so the already-existing behaviour (set the clock to the time the
package was built) will give a later time than previously.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue