[389-users] Re: help with replication changelog size

Changed the subject of this email as this message was filtered into my
junk folder...

On 7/15/24 1:05 PM, kamakshya nayak wrote:
> I have a cascading multi setup 389-ds.
> I observed that on my supplier, hub and consumer are doing good in
> terms of replication.
> They are healthy.
> What I observe is supplier and hub is doing good with replication and
> size of changelog.db for one of the backend suffix is less.
> But, consumer changelog.db disk space utilization is more around 34 Gb
> and supplier and hub changelog.db disk space utilization  is 40 mb.
> What could be the issue and why it's utilizing that high disk space
> for changelog.db ?

What version of 389-ds-base are you using?

At first glance it would appear you have changelog trimming configured
on the supplier/hub but not on the consumer.  That could be the issue,
or it could be changelog compaction.  On the other hand a consumer does
not need a changelog so you could remove it's configuration.

Also I don't see a "changelog.db" file in my setup, so maybe you are on
a very old version?

Mark

>
> And, why a consumer is holding changelog.db file.. where could be the
> issue.
>
> Thank you.
>
--
Identity Management Development Team

--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue