> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
> > mmc/sdhci modules.
>
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827
> kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457
> kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL
>
> So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
>
> I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps.
>
> Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression?
>
> (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed
> anything like that yet.)
Have you tested 5.1.x like .12 or the latest 5.2rc5 releases?
>
> Jan
>
>
> The vanilla kernels I have built with:
> https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch
> As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now:
> Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
No comments:
Post a Comment