[389-users] Re: Scripted letsencrypt certificate for 389-ds

> On 1 Apr 2020, at 05:14, Mark Reynolds <mreynolds@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/20 5:54 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 Mar 2020, at 01:14, Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 09:16 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 20:15 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Second, 1.4.0 is dead and
>>>>> has not been maintained in a very long time so the UI is probably
>>>>> very
>>>>> unstable in that version. Please use 389-ds-base-1.4.1 or higher.
>>>> I checked and the backport repo for debian 10 (buster) doesn't
>>>> have a more recent version than 1.4.0.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone maintaining a repository with a more recent version
>>>> than 1.4.0 for debian ?
>>> Debian unstable has 1.4.3 so I installed:
>>>
>>> # tail -1 /etc/apt/sources.list
>>> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
>>>
>>> # apt-get install 389-ds/unstable cockpit/unstable
>>>
>>> Ran :
>>>
>>> dscreate interactive
>>>
>>> cockpit 389 tab showed:
>>>
>>> "There is no 389-ds-base package installed on this system. Sorry there
>>> is nothing to manage..."
>>>
>>> 20200330 16:50:15<mreynolds> you should see the command that
>>> failed. Its trying to do "rpm -q 389-ds-base"
>>> 20200330 17:02:04<vashirov> ln -sf /usr/bin/true /usr/bin/rpm
>> Mark, I think we should make this a bug. Instead of checking for 'rpm -q ...' here, a better option could be to check for defaults.inf, or even to make a subcommand for dsctl or something that show's installed codebases. This will affect freebsd etc, and could be a good way to handle it instead. :)
>
> I already removed this rpm check. It's currently under review as part of the UI fix patch which you have already partially reviewed.

Wow look at you go, fixing stuff so fast :D

Thanks so much, I'll finish that review up today, and again, thanks Laurent for contacting us. Please let us know if we can help you in any other ways :)

>
> Mark
>
>>
>> Thanks Laurent, appreciate your patience with this!
>>
>>
>>> After this small hack everything worked.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>
>>> Laurent
>>>
>> —
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> William Brown
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>> SUSE Labs
>> _______________________________________________
>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> --
>
> 389 Directory Server Development Team
>

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org