> On 31 Mar 2020, at 01:14, Laurent GUERBY <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 09:16 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 20:15 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> Second, 1.4.0 is dead and
>>> has not been maintained in a very long time so the UI is probably
>>> unstable in that version. Please use 389-ds-base-1.4.1 or higher.
>> I checked and the backport repo for debian 10 (buster) doesn't
>> have a more recent version than 1.4.0.
>> Is anyone maintaining a repository with a more recent version
>> than 1.4.0 for debian ?
> Debian unstable has 1.4.3 so I installed:
> # tail -1 /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
> # apt-get install 389-ds/unstable cockpit/unstable
> Ran :
> dscreate interactive
> cockpit 389 tab showed:
> "There is no 389-ds-base package installed on this system. Sorry there
> is nothing to manage..."
> 20200330 16:50:15<mreynolds> you should see the command that
> failed. Its trying to do "rpm -q 389-ds-base"
> 20200330 17:02:04<vashirov> ln -sf /usr/bin/true /usr/bin/rpm
Mark, I think we should make this a bug. Instead of checking for 'rpm -q ...' here, a better option could be to check for defaults.inf, or even to make a subcommand for dsctl or something that show's installed codebases. This will affect freebsd etc, and could be a good way to handle it instead. :)
Thanks Laurent, appreciate your patience with this!
> After this small hack everything worked.
> Thanks for the help!
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
389-users mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe send an email to email@example.com
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://firstname.lastname@example.org