Thursday, April 15, 2021

[389-users] Re: dsctl healthcheck bug - or bad at least a bad resolution

On 4/15/21 4:23 PM, Gary Waters wrote:
>> These entries look fine.  I'm assuming you are running this on a hub
>> or consumer, is that correct?  Does it work correctly on the supplier
>> replica?  I think the "nsslapd-state=referral on update" might be
>> tripping up the healthcheck.
> Yes I am using this as a hub. The same ldif I use to make the suffix I
> use to make the suppliers and consumers, and they work fine (and dsctl
> healthcheck says they are ok).  The setting of nsslapd-state was set
> by the dsconf command I sent before. I checked a production hub I have
> (which this one will eventually replace), and that is the correct
> setting.
> Perhaps this is an issue with dsctl's healthcheck then.

There is definitely a bug, I was just trying to narrow it down. I'll try
and look into this tomorrow...

> -Gary

389 Directory Server Development Team
389-users mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:

No comments:

Post a Comment