[fedora-arm] Re: F37 Change: RetireARMv7 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:00 PM Adam Williamson
<adamwill@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 14:54 +0100, David Bold wrote:
> >
> >
> > I just tried to install Fedora on RPi, and I ended up on [1] where I
> > downloaded an image. That was unfortunately armv7 - and I needed to go
> > to [2] - which was not linked in the descriptions [3,4]. Also the wiki
> > lists first the armv7 [5]
> >
> > [1] https://arm.fedoraproject.org/
> > [2] https://alt.fedoraproject.org/alt/
> > [3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/raspberry-pi/
> > [4]
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/raspberry-pi/#installing-fedora-on-a-raspberry-pi-using-the-fedora-arm-installer_rpi
> > [5] https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora_Linux_35
>
> So yeah, I think cleaning up and modernizing all this should be in-
> scope for the Change, thanks for highlighting it.

This is already in motion as part of the work being done by the design
team on the website, it's unrelated to this change and has been in
motion for some time. All the arm/alt pages are going away and all
arches for each artifact will just be on the edition/spin/lab pages.

> The arm.fp.o site and the docs page you used are both, I think, older
> things that date from before we really supported aarch64 much at all,
> and they clearly haven't been updated. The "current" approach is not
> great either, though. If you just go in through the front door of the
> docs page you'd go to "User Documentation" for "Fedora Linux 35", which
> takes you here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f35/
>
> from where I guess you'd go to
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f35/install-guide/Downloading_Fedora/
> , which has an "ARM images" section which points you to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM . That page then
> points you to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Installation , which
> does at least cover aarch64, but seems to give armhfp equal or higher
> prominence.
>
> It would be great if we can get a doc person to take a look at all
> these pages referenced above and try to streamline them, modernize
> them, and get them all singing from the same hymn sheet, I guess.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure