Re: [389-users] 1.2.11.30 ETA?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=9xK7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:05:24 -0400
Michael Gettes <gettes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kind 389 devs,
>
> i am on 1.2.11.29 and for my environment - it's been great!
>
> I have been watching the tickets with respect to 1.2.11.30 and I am curious
> as to when this release may be available? There are a few items pertaining
> to my environment which we would so dearly appreciate. 346 would be a HUGE
> win for us. We are seeing periodic problems which seem to indicate 47773/4
> may address as well. I recognize you guys bust your butts and I truly hate
> asking this question - but please know your work is so appreciated.
>
> thank you so much!
>
> /mrg
>

I'd also like to know if anyone has anything specific they could share about
the intended release date of 1.2.11.30. I understand that it's a case of "When
It's Ready", but I was hoping to know if the fact that all the tickets in the
Trac milestone for it are closed now indicates that "When It's Ready" will be
soon. :-)

I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot of crashes on our
LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets that have
been fixed as part of 1.2.11.30, so we're hoping that the upgrade would make
our systems more stable.

Also if you need some help testing this prior to release we've got a QA
environment which we'd be happy to put a testing version on. (Sadly we haven't
had much luck replicating our own intermittent failures on a non-production
system though)

Thanks,
--
TimP
[http://hub.timp.com.au]
[http://blog.timp.com.au]