Re: [389-users] 1.2.11.30 ETA?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=XghX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
> > We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro
> > version, but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half a dozen or so a day;
> > we've got Puppet set up to check every five minutes and restart if it's
> > down). We're not absolutely sure that our problems are caused by the bugs
> > fixed in 1.2.11.30, but we want to try rolling out the fixes as soon as
> > possible to see if it alleviates the problems.
>
> Would you be willing to build from source?

We're willing to consider it, though we'd rather avoid it.
>
> >>> I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot of crashes on
> >>> our LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets
> >>> that have been fixed as part of 1.2.11.30, so we're hoping that the
> >>> upgrade would make our systems more stable.
> >> Which tickets are these?
> > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47696 is the ticket I reported, but
> > nhosoi created https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47750 as a related
> > ticket, and https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47764 seems to be affecting
> > us as well.
>
> Looks like these are due for RHEL 6.6 . . .

Hmm, OK, looks like some of them will be in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6, and
we're on 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5, so I'm guessing that it's not far off?

Thanks,
--
TimP
[http://hub.timp.com.au]
[http://blog.timp.com.au]