Re: [389-users] 1.2.11.30 ETA?

On 07/07/2014 08:45 AM, Michael Gettes wrote:
> Rich,
>
> if you mean 3 months for 1.2.11.30,

3 months for RHEL 6.6, give or take, and as always, subject to change.
That is, don't take this as an official Red Hat(tm) approved release
date announcement.

> then i might consider building this for my test environment - which is somewhat active. If you think this would be helpful.

Are you also running into these issues?

>
> /mrg
>
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2014 05:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
>>> On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
>>> Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
>>>>> We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro
>>>>> version, but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half a dozen or so a day;
>>>>> we've got Puppet set up to check every five minutes and restart if it's
>>>>> down). We're not absolutely sure that our problems are caused by the bugs
>>>>> fixed in 1.2.11.30, but we want to try rolling out the fixes as soon as
>>>>> possible to see if it alleviates the problems.
>>>> Would you be willing to build from source?
>>> We're willing to consider it, though we'd rather avoid it.
>>>>>>> I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot of crashes on
>>>>>>> our LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets
>>>>>>> that have been fixed as part of 1.2.11.30, so we're hoping that the
>>>>>>> upgrade would make our systems more stable.
>>>>>> Which tickets are these?
>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47696 is the ticket I reported, but
>>>>> nhosoi created https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47750 as a related
>>>>> ticket, and https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47764 seems to be affecting
>>>>> us as well.
>>>> Looks like these are due for RHEL 6.6 . . .
>>> Hmm, OK, looks like some of them will be in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6, and
>>> we're on 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5, so I'm guessing that it's not far off?
>> Would you consider "approximately 3 months, give or take" to be far off? If so, you might want to investigate building your own packages.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users