Monday, June 6, 2016

Re: Xfce4 panel plugins - GTK3 port

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=FhXE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 06/06/2016 11:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:42:39 +0200
> Dan Horák <dan@danny.cz> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:13:28 -0400
>> Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>>> Should we update to these development releases or should be wait for
>>> the next release? I have no preference either ways and I can build
>>> these if that's what we want to do.
>>
>> can you setup a copr repo for them? This way they can get some testing
>> and still won't slip into F-25 if not fully released upstream.
>
> Yeah, I think a copr repo would be best.
>
> I'd really not want to land them in rawhide and have the next release
> take longer than f25 (although I suppose its not the end of the world
> if some plugins are gtk3).
>
> kevin
>


OK folks, I will set up with a COPR for testing. That does sound like
the best course of action. I will post again when I have a working COPR.

Thanks for the responses.
Mukundan.


--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
-------

No comments:

Post a Comment