Monday, September 5, 2016

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Fix warnings Wstrict prototypes

On 09/04/2016 07:12 PM, William Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 18:07 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>> The 1st 16 patches are preparation for a last huge patch
>> which uses "(void)" for functions which does not expect
>> any arguments.
> I have tested and acked this patch series already.
> This is an extra patch to fix a few missed functions:
Hi Lukas, Hi William,

Thank you for the great effort for cleaning up the code. I also
reviewed the code and they look good.

Maybe, we should adjust all of them in one patch after the push, but if
we could avoid adding mismatched indentation, that'd be nice... We
already have quite a lot of places which look ugly... It sometimes make
the reviewer confused.

389-devel mailing list

No comments:

Post a Comment