Wednesday, September 14, 2016

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

Great - that was my preference just didn't want to overkill it. But this sounds like good test run of doing the process the right way...

Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 17:13, Josh Boyer <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters <> wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy, all,
>> I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of
>> 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have
>> an official coordination effort between those vendors/community members
>> who are interested, to ensure that they help with the necessary package
>> updates ahead of the kernel, and work with a test kernel to identify any
>> additional packages or issues that need resolving. I believe it would
>> make most sense to have a Fedora feature page (or something less grand,
>> but similar in concept) tracking this for F26, with the deps.
> I would very much advocate for the full Feature page. It will get the
> change the appropriate attention technically, and it will raise
> awareness of Aarch64 within Fedora from a general sense.
> josh
arm mailing list

No comments:

Post a Comment