[fedora-arm] Re: F23 aarch64 support for HiKey and Dragonboard?

On 09/14/2016 01:00 PM, Ziqian SUN(zsun) wrote:
> Sorry for reply on ancient mail.
> I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want to know what's the support status of Hikey Board?
>
> And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board usually needs a img. So if supported, any hints on how I can install it on my Hikey (or even, how can I convert the ISO to a img file)?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/F24/Installation

Hi,

The dragonboard uses a different bootloader (little kernel) than was is expected for Fedora aarch64 installation. There is a Fedora 23 remix that runs off of a sd card for the dragonboard 410c:

https://dmarlin.fedorapeople.org/fedora-arm/aarch64/README.Linaro-F23-remix-lxde

-Will

>
> On 09/25/2015 09:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Clive Messer <clive.m.messer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>> Is F23 aarch64 supporting either HiKey or Dragonboard?
>>
>> HiKey should boot with 4.2 (what's in F-23) with MMC, usb looks
>> terrible which isn't particularly useful, in theory wireless is
>> upstream but I've not had a chance to get that far as I'm awaiting a
>> decent UART [1] for easy debug of the board, at the moment I've not
>> enabled dragonboard (QCOM) but it's on my list for next week, it's
>> confirmed that HDMI has issues but everything else should work. The
>> QCom stuff has weird bootloaders (not uboot or uEFI) so YMMV.
>>
>> [1] http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/96Boards-UART-p-2525.html?ref=newInBazaar
>> _______________________________________________
>> arm mailing list
>> arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
>>
>
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org