Friday, September 23, 2016

Re: back to the "incubator brand" discussion: reviving Playground

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:08:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We need to revisit why it ultimately stalled then. I think Matthew's
> plans on documentation and purpose will help, but if it had traction
> before and then fizzled out we need to avoid repeating that mistake
> again.

Before, it was going to be specifically an RPM repository with more
relaxed packaging guidelines. That stalled because of the stuff Smooge
said. With COPR as successful as it is, I don't think we really need
that unified repository anyway. This incarnation is a lot more
lightweight — it isn't a specific service or anything; it's a brand.

Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
council-discuss mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

No comments:

Post a Comment