---------------------+---------------------
Reporter: bex | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------+---------------------
Comment (by bex):
I understand your concerns Josh. I also was implying parts of your points
smooge. I am less concerned with FAS groups (though in some cases they
may be problematic) and I am not trying to strip anyone of a vote.
Rather, I am thinking of two goals:
1) Being able to point people toward groups working in Fedora
2) Determine who is allowed to ask for Budget, officially represent us,
etc. When we talked about opening up the budget process to try and allow
for greater input, I seem to recall there being a requirement that you be
a recognized sub-project.
The wiki hints at a process to become a SIG, etc. If we have this kind of
a process then it implies that some groups have completed it and some
groups are in process and others have not started. I think we just need
to bring some definition.
Lastly, I would like to consider trying to codify this information
somewhere other than in the Wiki. It is a long term goal and a project I
am not even ready to outline as a request for comments yet.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/70#comment:5>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
No comments:
Post a Comment