>
> I've been lurking in the mailing lists for about 6 years now after an
> incident I had with a couple people in #fedora while I "myself" was
> helping people and considering becoming a contributor (a friend of
> mine was considering joining the design team). After the incident and
> absolutely nothing done about it we decided that fedora was not the
> place for either of us at the time.
>
> That said, here's a concern that I have based on something I was told
> by an op at the time. I was told that #fedora cannot be governed,
> controlled, or anything other such measure as fedora does not have
> anything to actually do with that channel. Now I may not be using the
> right wording here, but along the lines of ownership.
>
> Is that truly the case? If it is, then in my personal opinion nothing
> will ever change in that channel and for something to change fedora
> needs to create a separate channel that is fully governed by fedora.
>
> I'm going to look later and see if it was in email that this was said
> to me. Hopefully if it was I still have it.
>
I am not sure who told you this, but I do not believe it to be true.
According to Freenode policy, single hash channels created with the same
names as a project are considered to be owned by that project. If it
was decided at any time that the council agreed to do such, they could
contact an IRC Cop of Freenode and have the founder information of
#fedora changed at-will.
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.
No comments:
Post a Comment