Re: making https://github.com/fedoraproject official?

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:42:55AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> I would prefer the Pagure instead of getfedora.org as Pagure aims to
> >> the same purpose as GitHub does.
> >> getfedora.org is more a hub to download already done stuff, where
> >> Pagure as well as GitHub is a collaborative space holding source
> >> codes/repositories.
> >
> > True. My concern is that pagure.io isn't _just_ Fedora stuff or
> > official Fedora Project, and the front page is a little intimidating
> > and confusing.
>
> If we had all the Fedora stuff namespaced under a Fedora organization
> in pagure.io, it might be easier.

This would definitely work, however it creates an extra layer. I think
a key challenge with Pagure today is that as Matthew pointed out, the
front page is very intimidating. I also find the search to be very
non-intuitive. The displays of repos i'm in/watching/etc. is also
sorted in a way that isn't obvious to me and I find that private forks
sometimes rank higher than their upstreams.

I wonder if we could find people interested in cleaning up the interface
a bit more as I know that Pingou and team are busy. I also wonder if
fedora.pagure.io or pagure.fp.o wouldn't be a better home for Fedora
specific stuff.

regards,

bex
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org