[389-users] Re: ldap perfomance

On 9/6/2018 8:50 AM, isabella.ghiurea@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca wrote:
> This does not justify this since running 1 tread takes 0.1564msec/op and running 10 threads takes 0.0590ms/op and the last one will require the access.log to be flush more frequently I think for 10 threads and I do not see the spike in exec time showed for 1 thread. Maybe something else ?
> _______________________________________________
>

I think, looking at the data you posted, the question you're asking is
"why, when I subject my server to a continuous search operation load, do
some operations have much longer latency than others?".

This isn't a performance issue per se, imho because performance overall
is acceptable. The problem is that rsearch reports a maximum search
response time that is quite high. That maximum could have been measured
on only _one_ operation though.

_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org