Re: Fedora Censorship status

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:27 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21/09/2020 21:08, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:43 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> At various times this year, people have written things that appeared on
> >> Planet Fedora and other people had no right of reply because their blogs
> >> were never included there or blogs had been actively censored.
> >>
> >> Given the latest discussions taking place about what potentially amounts
> >> to censorship, I feel it is critical that anybody with a view is able to
> >> use all communication channels, including Planet Fedora, to draw
> >> attention to whatever concerns they have.
> >
> > Since we're offering opinions, I'll offer mine as well.
> >
> > I feel the opposite and find blog posts unrelated to Fedora appearing
> > on Planet Fedora to be a distraction. I also feel that this isn't
> > censorship as there is no inherent right to post whatever people want
> > on Fedora run services.
>
>
> Nonetheless, if somebody does in fact post a distraction, why shouldn't
> people impacted by the distraction have a right-of-reply, in your terms,
> posting a counter-distraction?

This is a good question. I would do 2 things.

1) Offer the ability for people to make take-down requests, removing
the specific post from the aggregator.
2) If 1 got too large then just remove the aggregator entirely and
replace it with vetted and curated blog posts driven through the a
dedicated Fedora SIG focused on reviewing the content.

josh
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org