Re: Fedora Council policy proposal: Community Publishing Platforms

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RcaA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 9/21/20 2:32 PM, Alessio wrote:
> So, we could assume that a Community Publishing Platform is whatever platform with the Fedora trademark? And such platform is supposed to follow the Fedora CoC.
> Let's assume a group of passionate users (or a single one) using the Fedora trademark on a blog or wathever. In this case the Council has final say on decisions related to this platform only if things go wrong? I mean, if the platform isn't official, isn't "approved", isn't endorsed by the Council, but it is a polite and a nice place and there are not complaints involving the CoC, is it OK?


Yes! This would be OK. And it is what happens in practice anyways. :)


--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory (he/him)
https://jwf.io
TZ=America/New_York