[389-devel] Re: failed to build rpms

You have to skip the npm audit check "SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1" for now, and the
rust stuff is a pain and it is hardcoded to be enabled. You always have
to update and download the latest Rust dependencies:

SKIP_AUDIT_CI=1 make -f rpm.mk update-cargo-dependencies
download-cargo-dependencies rpms

HTH,

Mark

On 2/23/21 1:40 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since a long time I was trying to build rpms and failed, here are the
> issues I run into:
>
> 1] problem with npm/audit
>
> I followed the suggestions here:
> https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/contributing.html (pushd/npm
> fix/popd), but this didn't help, only commenting out audit-ci in
> src/cockpit/389-console/node_modules.mk got me over this
>
> 2] rust
>
> 2.1]
>
> rpm build failed with:
>
> error: failed to get `concread` as a dependency of package `librslapd
> v0.1.0
> (/home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/src/librslapd)`
>
> Caused by:
>   failed to load source for dependency `concread`
>
> Caused by:
>   Unable to update registry
> `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
>
> Caused by:
>   failed to update replaced source registry
> `https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index`
>
> Caused by:
>   failed to read root of directory source:
> /home/elkris/DEV/gh/two/389-ds-base/rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/vendor
>
> Caused by:
>   No such file or directory (os error 2)
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:12715:
> .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a]
> Error 101
>
>
> ,
>
> It was right that there wasno rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a file, not
> even the directory rs existed. After configuring --enable-rust the
> directory was created and populated.
>
> Q1: why does it try to pack rust stuff if it is not enabled ?
>
> 2.2] Now the directory was there, but I still did get the same error.
> A closer look showed that it was looking for
> .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/release/librslapd.a
> ,but what existed was
> .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-base-2.0.3.20210223gitbda2c53d0/rs/rslapd/debug/librslapd.a.
> Note "debug" -- "release". configure was run with --enable-debug
>
> Q2: Is there somewhere a hardcoded/default assumpion of "release" ? in
> the cargo spec?
>
> Thanks for any suggestions
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ludwig
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

--

389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure