Monday, September 20, 2021

[fedora-arm] Re: Wiki claims RPi 4 is not supported

Hi,

On 9/19/21 8:53 AM, Barry wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Sep 2021, at 11:17, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Am 18.09.21 um 21:58 schrieb Barry Scott:
>>> On this page it states that the RPi4 is not supported.
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_4
>>
>> yes the statement about hardware support isn't quite correct anymore.
>> But there is still a noticeable difference between the mainline kernel
>> (which Fedora uses) and the vendor kernel from the Raspberry Pi Foundation.
>>
>> Most notably are:
>> - audio support
>> - V3D support
>
> An update to say clearly that only server/headless worked then would better the. The blanket "it does not work". I is only that I looked deeper that I found out that it
> might work.
>
> Oh and would need a warning that the boot is very slow.
> I see a black screen for a couple of minutes before I see any output
> from the kernel or systemd.

That is part of why its still "unsupported", the platform is still a bit
unstable in many ways. The slow boot is likely the same as this problem:

https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1619

which should really be titled "GET_CLOCK behavior change causing
problems everywhere". There are various less than ideal workarounds at
this point, but for most users the best plan is probably to just revert
to an older firmware that works as expected.

Particularly for this problem, it would be useful if you mentioned the
uboot version your getting from Fedrora, as AFAIK pbrobinson pushed a
workaround to uboot that should make it better.






>
>>
>> A lot users doesn't accept this. Instead of blaming the vendor to focus
>> on its own kernel branch, they blame Fedora for using the mainline
>> kernel. So that's the reason to say it's not officially supported.
>>
>>> There a lots of messages in this mailing archieve showing that people are
>>> getting Fedora to work on RPi4.
>>>
>>> Is there still a reason to claim its not supported?
>>> If so what should I be watching out for/avoiding with the RPi4?
>> For a headless / server setup there shouldn't be no general issues.
>
> Food to know.
>
> Barry
>
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

No comments:

Post a Comment