Hi Julian,
This is likely the impact of
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2480 that was introduced in
1.4.x.
On 1.4.4 default hash is PBKDF2, this ticket upgrade hash of user
entries during the user bind (enabled with nsslapd-enable-upgrade-hash).
best regards
thierry
On 11/22/22 09:25, Julian Kippels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a radius server that reads the userPassword-attribute from
> ldap to authenticate users. There is a strange phenomenon where
> sometimes the answer from the ldap-server gives the wrong password
> hash algorithm. Our global password policy storage scheme is set to
> SSHA. When I perform a ldapsearch as directory manager I see that the
> password hash for a given user is {SSHA}inserthashedpasswordhere. But
> when I run tcpdump to see what our radius is being served I see
> {PBKDF2_SHA256}someotherhash around 50% of the time. Sometime another
> request from radius a few seconds after the first one gives the
> correct {SSHA} response.
>
> This happened right after we updated from 389ds 1.2.2 to 1.4.4.
> I am a bit stumped.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
No comments:
Post a Comment