Hello,
I have a question.
With EPEL8 modular, when I want to do a fresh 389ds installation i use the command:
dnf module install 389-directory-server:stable/default
which provides 389ds version 2.0.15
Now, if I do a fresh installation using copr, there is no "stable" tag. If I just do a:
dnf install 389-ds-base
it provides 389ds version 2.2.4
So, it seems using copr also means upgrading 389ds from 2.0.x version to 2.2.x. version.
I see there are 4 currently 389ds releases:
2.0.x
2.1.x
2.2.x
2.3.x
What is in general the suggested/recommended 389ds version to be installed EL8-based (Almalinux, RockyLinux, etc.) production systems ?
Thanks,
Rosario
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
No comments:
Post a Comment