On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:53 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
<dominik@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 19:42, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> [...]
> > I can confirm that this works just fine. I have 2 RockPro64's running
> > Fedora 37 here and using u-boot on SPI from there. It reminds me I should
> > document how I built a Fedora based NAS with 10 drives using a RockPro64.
> > It is not the most performant but suits me
>
> Yes, please do that. I'm keeping an eye out for a replacement of my
> current Atom-based NAS and this could be it. Please include some
> benchmarks and power consumption info.
Depending on how much of a rush you're in I would look for something
based on the rk3568 [1], as it has 3x sata, 2x NIC and 2x pcie
options, or the rk3588 series. We don't support them fully as yet,
especially the later, but they'll be more performant and will quickly
start to replace the venerable rk3399. F-38 should support the rk356x
series pretty well outside of the firmware support which still needs
improvement.
[1] https://www.cnx-software.com/2020/12/16/rockchip-rk3566-and-rk3568-datasheets-and-features-comparison/
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
No comments:
Post a Comment