Thanks! Which index should I put on modifyTimestamp?
Tim Darby
From: William Brown via 389-users <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 16:52
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Darby, Tim - (tdarby) <tdarby@arizona.edu>; William Brown <wbrown@suse.de>
Subject: [EXT] [389-users] Re: Using modifyTimeStamp in queries
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 16:52
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Darby, Tim - (tdarby) <tdarby@arizona.edu>; William Brown <wbrown@suse.de>
Subject: [EXT] [389-users] Re: Using modifyTimeStamp in queries
External Email
On 1 Nov 2024, at 08:51, tdarby--- via 389-users <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
We have an application that needs to query for and return thousands of entries with modifyTimeStamp greater than a given time. This is turning out to be too slow for this app and so I'm wondering if there's any way to speed this up other than throwing more CPU at it.
Is modifyTimestamp indexed?
Have you raised your idlscanlistlimit to 999999999?
Sounds like you have a full table scan going on. The above two changes will fix it.
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer,
Identity and Access Management
SUSE Labs, Australia
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer,
Identity and Access Management
SUSE Labs, Australia
No comments:
Post a Comment