Thursday, November 6, 2025

[389-users] Re: Deleting attributes using dsidm

Hi Jonathan,

On 11/6/25 8:52 AM, Jonathan Buzzard via 389-users wrote:
>
> Is there a reason behind the need to supply the existing value of an
> attribute for a user when deleting it?

I believe the original thought was that it could be a multi-valued
attribute.  In such a case you need to know which value to delete. 
However, in your case you just need a trailing ":" on the attribute but
with no value

    dsidm -b <basedn> ldap1 user modify testuser delete:shadowExpire:

On our side we should improve the usage/man page to clearly explain how
this works.

Regards,

Mark

> For example if I want to enable an account which had a shadowExpire
> attribute set then the logical thing to do would be
>
> dsidm -b <basedn> ldap1 user modify testuser delete:shadowExpire
>
> because I really don't care what the existing value is and for that
> matter I don't actually know what it is. This would be analogous to doing
>
> chage -E -1 testuser
>
> on a traditional /etc/shadow based system, where using -1 as the date
> simply removes the expire entry from /etc/shadow.
>
> In my mind, in general if I want to delete an attribute from a user it
> seems bizarre that I need to know what it is. I mean I can modify the
> value without knowing what it is so why the need to know what it is to
> delete it?
>
>
> JAB.
>
--
Identity Management Development Team

--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

No comments:

Post a Comment