[389-users] Docker, dscontainer, and production version(s)

Hello, I could use a little advice before I go down too many more rabbit holes: We are looking to run 389 in Docker and we prefer a stable version that will be supported for a while. We have a large user base and and value stability over new features. Is there a maintained docker image for, ideally, 389 versions 2.6 or 2.7? I'm open to 2.8 or 3.0 but worry they are a bit too bleeding edge for use in a large-ish environment. 2.4 worked well for us when we last tested but looks to now but deprecated. I'm happy to diy but from my testing and reading 2.6 and 2.7 dscontainer, at least in Alma Linux 9 as the base Docker image, seem to be buggy: the config directory is not correctly populated in the data directory. I am game for diy'ing a 2.8 or 3.0 Docker image if the consensus is that they are production ready but does dscontainer work in them and do you have a suggestion for what Docker operating system base image to use? I see 3.0, and maybe 2.8, can be enabled through copr in Alma 9 but don't want to get *too* exotic for production use. thank you! -morgan -- _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new